|
Introduction:
The following are a very brief selection of some of my observations
on local culture made while living independently in the former USSR.
Still unsure what to call the residents of this new land, I have opted
to exchange freely between "Soviets" and "Russians" in this paper.
Other terms may be used, such as "residents of the former Soviet Union",
"Russians, Ukrainians, Kazaks, Belarusians, etc....", but I find these
terribly bulky. For all practical purposes, the old Soviet
cultural and economic apparatus still exerted a major influence on the
residents at the time of my residency, whatever the case may be now.
The transliterations of words given follow no official standard
(unlike in my other writings where I employ the LOC transliteration
standard), but are given to as nearly as possible approximate their
actual sound if read and spoken by an American speaker.
On lines:
Word has it that lines, ocheredi, are a thing of the past in the
xUSSR. Now we have all, it is said, though one might add
that the prices are so high the average national hasn't the money for
most of it. So we may say that they save time; there is
no more waiting in lines with a growling stomach, the stomach may growl
in front of the television now. But as I attempt here to
give my observations on the state of affairs in 1992 and 1993, let us
return to that time.
Having sometimes a little too much disdain for the Soviet way
of life, I rarely waited in lines -- unless I had to. I
learned when and where the lines were shortest, and incorporated this
into my schedule. The open market ("rinok") had no lines,
only vast crowds, which I could deal with, even enjoyed.
The "commercial shops" and many kiosks had no lines, though again, many
crowds. Though prices were higher at these places, even
in hard currency, I was rich and it was worth it.
Sometimes, however, I had no choice. Train stations
were the worst. To buy a rail ticket was more than an ordeal,
and it sometimes seemed a way of life. A wait of an hour
or two to buy a ticket was usually my limit. Others waited
longer, and could be seen sleeping on makeshift camps, made from piles
of God-knows-what in bags on the floor of the vokzal, while taking shifts
at the line amongst their group. Sometimes I would wait
for an hour or more only to realize that the window wasn't actually
even open, but people were waiting anyway! Often, a line
would have a 30 or 60 minute "delay" in the middle of the wait while
the window-person went on break. Sometimes, the window
would be announced "closed" after a wait of hours, with the weary line-waiters
left to fend for themselves in another line!
I remember a memorable episode in Irkutsk: I was ready
to return to Minsk, and to the USA, after a month at Baikal, and a year
in the USSR. I arrived at the ticket office early, just
after the noon hour lunch closure had begun. Thought I'd
have an easy time of it, I did, being good and early. This
was my first mistake; my second was in assuming that even if I was "first"
in line that this would really matter to anyone. As it turned
out, there was already about 30 people waiting on the large concrete
entryway to the office. Over the next hour we were joined
by perhaps a hundred others. As the fateful hour approached,
the crowd gathered closer to the door-in no particular order-in anticipation.
I got scared. At one o'clock, the crowd was an amorphous
mass of drab clothing, sweat, and flesh, pressed to the double entry
doors. I stood nearby. At about ten after, I
saw the one we had waited for: an old woman appeared from the
interior of the office, walking slowlyand with more than a touch
of trepidationtoward the door. She carefully removed
the steel pipe blocking the door movements and promptly ran in the opposite
direction. The crowd at first sort of quivered-they were
stuck in the opening like hair in a clogged drain.
Then they were free. They were as a flood; a truly
frightening sight, and flowed violently toward the ticket counters.
To reach these, it was necessary to go approximately 15 meters inside
the building and around a couple corners and doorways. This
was sufficient time for the thugs (including several tough young women)
to reach the front at the expense of the old, the weak, and the slow,
who separated to the back of the crowd. This was not at
all a smooth sifting; it was accomplished by shouting, pushing, shoving,
running, and grabbing. I saw several people go down.
I waited until the violence had abated before going in; it just wasn't
worth it. When inside, there were various shouting and pushing
matches going on for places within each of the eight ticket-window lines.
Old women bickered over who was before whom, while others merely regained
their composure or breath. "You're all crazy!", I said to myself
in English.
There is a particularly irritating trait of some line-waiters
to stand alongside ill-defined lines and gradually "ease up" toward
the front. They try to do this as slowly as to be unnoticed.
Sometimes they are quite in a hurry, and their speed is almost as a
slow jog. Strangely, considering the behavior in the ticket
office described above, there was nary a whisper of protest when I observed
this on several occasions. The worst example was at Lenin's
Tomb, where one young man and his date "eased away" probably 20 minutes
of the 45 minute line. At Lenin's tomb! Is nothing
sacred anymore?
Tempers run high in the lines, especially on hot days or in a
crowded shop or public office. Boredom is the main feature
of a queue and the faces of its members, occasionally anger or violence.
But more often than crudeness, I noticed certain acts of formalized
civility in the lines. There is, for example, the standard
act of asking "kto posledni" when joining a new line, so as not to commit
the vulgarity of "cutting" in line. One may usually leave
the line to take care of other business, such as looking at other merchandise.
One need only state "Ya seichas pridu" to explain the absence.
And, of course, it's always the possibility of making new friends while
queuing
On books and the post-Soviet reader:
Great Rus is a nation of readers. One who has eyes
will see this evidenced every day, in all locations. The
metro stations may be considered as underground halls of living sculpture,
there on display are countless strangers, heads buried, each as stoic
as limestone, granite, or bronze. In the hands are
copies of translated cheap western paperbacks, scientific and technical
works by soviet authors, Pravda and Literaturnaya Gazeta, sex tabloids,
personal letters, bibles, manuals on dacha construction; gardening;
or business, Russian and World literature, to name a few variants.
Do not assume that everyone reads; this is not the case, though those
who do make up for the others in zeal.
A good place to see the mechanics behind this is at the used book
store. I, too, am a lover of books, and found the acquisition
of them to be a great source of diversion, challenge, pleasure, even
therapy. I came to frequent several establishments in Minsk
on a regular basis. "Regular" means two to four times per
week, often more. "Bukinisticheskaya Kniga", on Prospekt
Skoryini, was my main haunt. There I purchased everything
from atlases to encyclopedic reference volumes, literature, cookbooks,
and more. "Vyanok", in the historic district, was my second
favorite. It specialized more in art books, literature,
and encyclopedias and dictionaries, though other books were often had
as well. There were several others in Minsk specializing
in used books, and at each I was known as a regular. Each
one was unique; each one was an island of civility. The
stores were usually crowded. Patrons examining, reading,
comparing, discussing, and buying books might have appeared to the uninitiated
as chaotic, but such was the thrill involved.
The driving force behind much of this was the book buying area,
normally located in a separate area of the building, where suitable
books were bought from people who brought them in. Again,
there was usually a crowd, equal to the one inside buying books.
I never checked, but I wonder if some of those selling went afterward
to the buying area of the stores. Certainly there was an
equilibrium between buying and selling. I attribute this
constant selling of books to the need for continually greater income
in the unraveling economy, but this factor cannot account for the constant
buying of books. The turnover of books at the shops was
amazingly rapid. For this reason I deemed it necessary to
visit the second-hand dealers regularly, as mentioned above.
A particularly desirable book, which may include large atlases, dictionaries
of all kinds, foreign-language editions, literature volumes, and others,
may be sold within a matter of hours, or even minutes, of being placed
on display. When I saw, for example, the large Atlas SSSR
on display in the window of Bukinisticheskaya, I knew that I must act
immediately. Cost: 20¢.
On numerous occasions after purchasing certain books, I
recall being asked to show the book to others in the store, or even
in the metro or on the street! The 2 volume Krasnaya Kniga
SSSR, one of my greatest treasures, drew particular interest, as did
several books on cooking, animals, and technical subjects.
Little attention was given when I purchased the repair manual for the
diesel locomotive û¸ë-7 (yes, that's right, the repair
manual for a diesel locomotive). Each time I went to the
store, even on the same day, I would see numerous "new" books on display,
many more I am sure I did not see before they went to new homes, and
this I am sure I dwell upon too much... Rarely a visit to
the second-hand bookstore did not net me several new finds, all at bargain
prices, of course. Dictionaries and literature sets fetched
the highest prices, as well as newly available subjects, such as poorly
translated mystery and romance novels, Aubrey Beardsly and other books
of an "erotic" and sexual nature, Dianetics by L. Ron Hubbard, and curiosities
such as the encyclopedic Pistoleti i Revolveri, seen regularly at increasingly
high prices. Thankfully for me, books of a geographic and
natural sciences slant were apparently less valued on the resale market.
On the trains with communism:
The best place to see real communism, in a microcosm, is on the
trains.
Once I rode first class ("luks"), but all it got me was a job,
and no communism. The other person in the 2-bed compartment
was Ludmila Prisakova, from Moscow, now living in the USA and working
with Larry Schiller and Norman Mailer on their various schemes.
If one knows the attitude attributed to Muscovites, and adds this to
one who now lives in the USA, makes decent money, and hob-nobs with
the stars, one can not imagine railway communism in the same thought.
We rode to from Moscow to Minsk on train ï2, and all I can
remember of the trip is that I wished I was with a real Russian,
and we discussed her gift from her daughter (a student at an expensive
American college): a pocket electronic memo-pad by Casio.
Several days later I was approached at my door by one Aleksandr "Sasha"
Batanov, recruiting me as a writer for Norman Mailer...1
The standard way of travel is in the "kupò" wagon, with
4 to a compartment, 2 top, 2 bottom. Usually it's relatively
clean, with decent futon-type mattresses, and I always sleep quite well,
thank you, on the trains. It's best when those in the compartment
are all strangers, because then there are only new friends to make.
About 30 minutes after leaving the station, depending on trip length,
time of departure, etc., the passengers (who may be tired and hungry
from their traveling activities) will usually eat. There
is but one table in the compartment, and it is from this table that
the revolution is staged, nine times simultaneously in each 36 passenger
wagon.
One example of this which lends itself to my theory follows.
Late for the train (as always), I hurried onto the car and found my
place on the bottom left "mesto". With me on this trip was
a young man going to visit relatives and an old woman and her husband
returning from the same. As is customary, I traded my lower
bunk to the woman for her upper bunk, and promptly fell into slumber.
On the platform near the train I had bought as many bottles of Pepsi
as I could fit into my bag, planning on drinking them liberally on the
train (for I always become parched on the trains). The others,
however, after several kilometers began to take food from their bags
and place it on the table. The young man worked at a sausage
factory, and had samples2
to share, as well as fish caught recently. The old couple had
cucumbers, cheese, bread, and other items. For a while
I was quiet on the top mesto, reading and looking out the window, but
after a short while I was invited to share their feast.
I had only the Pepsi, but it was my contribution, according to my means,
and I was an equal at the table. It is very possible to make a
very nice dinner from the fragments brought with each comrade.
Following dinner and conversation we rested. After an unexplained
three hour stop somewhere in southern Ukraine, we reached Chernigov,
where the three comrades of mine quietly exited the car and my life
while I slept. When I awoke as the train left the station,
I was aware of my new companions: two of the most ill-mannered
and unpleasant, though generally harmless Soviet youths I have met.
Lithuanians. They were on the way back to Vilnius, after
"biznis" (buying) in Chernigov. They were tired from a day
of biznis, and ready to drink. They apparently thought I
was too, as they continually offered me some of their "harelka" (which
as far as I know is an alternative work in Belarusian and Ukrainian
for vodka, and must be a borrowed word in Lithuanian as well).
They proposed I come to visit them in Lithuania, meet their local women,
etc. As we traveled further from their boarding point, likewise
did they become more intoxicated, and the amount of alcohol on their
breath was positively volatile. Repeatedly, I was offered
harelka. I was an equal.
The next class of wagon down is called "plotzkart", with an open
carriage, additional bunks, and a total capacity of 54 or 56 passengers.
I had heard it to be unpleasant from Soviet acquaintances, but actually
found it strangely appealing. One time I took this type
wagon to Moscow from Orøl. Luckily I had a single
bunk near the aisle and a window. In the plotzkarte, you
may see and hear all your traveling companions quite well.
Sometimes there are attractive women; more often there are houligani
and other thugs. I admit with some regret that I sometimes
made judgments too hastily, though it is necessary. Nearby,
a group of several scruffy men and women occasionally looked at me.
I did my best to give menacing looks back. At last they
began a series of "nightcaps", and shortly thereafter asked me to join
them. I politely declined, thinking "Ah-ha!, they're trying
to get me drunk, so as to facilitate my robbery during the night!"
They persisted, and after some time I gave in. As it turned
out, they were civil, friendly, and interested only in saying hello,
with a Russian slant. I had a small amount of drink with
them, but the morning checked my things nonetheless: undisturbed.
We bade farewell in Moscow, we were comrades.
The lowest class of train is "obshe". This is a plotzkarte
wagon, filled with as many people as will fit or are interested in traveling
in it. It is also, of course, cheapest. The
favorite means of travel for students, soldiers, and other poor folk.
One time my train (Minsk-Simferopol) peculiarly did not appear on the
platform in Minsk. having planned my month-long excursion
to Crimea for quite a while, I was interested only in getting there,
and leaving Minsk immediately, regardless of the method or route.
Briefly, I considered going via Kishinøv, but then I was informed
that there was passing through Minsk in several hours the Riga-Simferopol
train. I managed to bribe my way onto the obshe wagon of
said train, with promise of a place in kupe in the morning when it became
available. So into the obshe wagon I went, bags and all.
The wagon was so crowded, however, that I was able to get no farther
than 3 meters inside the car. For an hour or so I stood,
squatted, and leaned in the entryway, unsure about the quality of fellow
passengers and of my safety. Around me various conversations
were going on between other passengers. Interested in why
I was silent, they began talking to me, and found (because I never try
to conceal the fact) that I was an American. That changed
everything. I was treated with courtesy, friendliness, and
respect. I actually found the people on that car, scruffy
and rough-looking as they were, to be some of the nicest people I had
met. After several hours, I was amazed to find there was
actually a conductor on the wagon, who had emerged somehow from the
interior of the wagon. Though dressed in the remains of
what once was a clean new blue conductor's uniform, he looked otherwise
similar to the others. Upon finding I was an American, he
cleared miscellaneous pieces of railroad equipment, coal, and junk from
his long-abandoned resting compartment, making me a makeshift seat,
and presenting this semi-private area to me as if I were a VIP.
Was this communism as well?
I seldom, if ever, had a compartment-mate on the train who was
intentionally unfriendly toward me, and the trains were always the best
method of travel. Never did I travel without interesting
conversation and scenery.
On racism in the USSR:
The Soviet people, as in so many other qualities purported in
their constitution and popular politics, frequently exhibited the exact
opposite of the "druzhba narodov" principle. Witness the
various civil wars at the moment.
Upon settling in in Minsk, I reported to a Russian friend that
my neighbor was Syrian. "Oh, it's very bad", she sighed.
African students I spoke with reported being continually insulted and
treated as inferior by university officials, Soviet students, and the
general population. Ironically, the most damning information
to this effect came from a couple of African "studentki" with whom I
had some of the most interesting and intelligent conversation in some
time, especially as compared to Soviet studentki. Similar
conversations with other Africans bore this out. Africans,
I found, were some of the best and smartest people; always good, intelligent,
and interesting conversation with them. I wonder if the
CMU "Multi-cultural Center" knows anything about this...
Africans, Middle Easterners, and non-Slavic Soviets fare worst for racism.
Western Europeans and Americans and Canadians are seen as "equals".
On the Russian notion of Baikal:
Mention Lake Baikal to a Soviet, and they'll say either "Ochen
krasivwi!" or "Oh, I'd like to go there very much" as an apparently
automatic response. Often this will be accompanied by waxing
poetic on the virtues of the lake, as heard from a friend who has been
there, stories heard, or, occasionally, experience. Having
spent some time at the lake myself, and having seen examples of
Soviet respect for public property, I can say with some certainty that
I am quite glad that relatively few actually have been there.
Baikal looms large in the heart of Russians' sentimental mentality
as a heavenly ideal, as an abstract notion on what nature is,
as a giant not created by socialism, as Baikal. For most
it is enough to know that Baikal is there, in their country, though
it belongs to the world. It is not simply a vaguely known
entity, as Lake Superior is to Americans, lost in the mind and insignificant.
Baikal is real and present in the mind of a Russian; the spirit dormant
until conjured by mention of the word: Baikal. Valentin
Rasputin represents the individual, stubborn and vigilant, who is a
citizen of Baikal. Most residents of the Baikal area will
speak more practically of the lake; of its meter-thick perfectly clear
ice in the winter, of its fish, of its seals, of its fragility, of its
spirituality. Many who have been there or live there respect
the lake, but I also saw examples of litter, degradation, and shameful
disrespect at the lake. In the mind and soul of a good Russian,
however, Baikal is perfect and to be defended. Baikal belongs
to the world, though its keeper is the Russian soul.
|